The Blind Side

I think it was interesting to see a different outlook on this film as opposed to the majority of criticism that I hear. It's interesting how loose this film is related toward the actual book by Michael Lewis, in the way the main character, Michael Ohrer, acts in the book as opposed to the modified version in the Blind Side. When movies say " based on a true story", they never really say to what extent is it based on. The Texas Chainsaw massacre claims the events that occurred in the film were based on "true events" when in actuality, it was loosely based on the killings of serial killer Ed Gein, by only a small portion. What really set off this in author in particular was how a film like this can be Academy Awarded with a story that is so flawed. I also think that his movies have it's traditional values all mixed up and drift toward the line of what's realistic and whats not. It leaves the audience with the message that with a big heart and a bigger wallet that you have the ability to change someones life. In a different perspective, the director of this film wanted to make a film that targeted a specific audience. He rather cater to a large audience of middle aged Americans than to the minority of people who actually read the book and distinguished the flaws. If you compare the two movies, Dangerous Minds, and , Lean On Me, you notice although they have similar plot structure, there execution is much different. Reason being is in my mind the thought of Morgan Freeman, someone who has has been in the perspective of those inner city kids, has a better understanding as the problems there suffering. For that, i think Morgan Freeman is a more believable character than Michelle Phieffer as a ex-marine, and that audiences can relate to Freeman's character better. As you can see the Blind Side shows it's effort in appealing to a broader audience, yet falls short to believable realism in the plot structure.